Temperature Effects on Fatigue of Thermoset and Thermoplastic Composites

1. Static Mechanical Performance: Thermoset vs. Thermoplastic Composites

Tensile tests performed across the full temperature range reveal clear differences in the static behavior between thermoset and thermoplastic materials. The evaluated thermoset composite maintains a relatively stable modulus and tensile strength even as temperature approaches +120°C, confirming its suitability for high-temperature composite mold applications and structural components in automotive environments.

In contrast, the two thermoplastic composites exhibit more significant variations in stiffness and elongation. Their temperature-dependent viscoelastic behavior leads to reduced modulus at high temperatures but improved impact performance at low temperatures. This duality makes them ideal for parts manufactured through compression molding, especially components requiring energy absorption.

2. Fatigue Behavior Under Extreme Temperatures

The fatigue test results highlight temperature as a dominant factor in long-term structural reliability. At elevated temperatures, polymers undergo chain mobility changes and microstructural relaxation, accelerating fatigue damage. The thermoplastic materials show greater sensitivity to this effect, while the thermoset composite demonstrates superior high-temperature fatigue resistance due to its highly cross-linked network.

This is particularly important for manufacturers of compression-molded composite parts, including:

• Automotive underbody protection systems
• EV battery structural housings
• Engine compartment covers
• High-load brackets and cross-car beams
• Industrial pump and motor components

MDC’s expertise in SMC mold, BMC mold, carbon fiber mold, and thermoplastic composite mold development ensures reliable processing for these demanding applications.

3. Implications for Composite Mold and Compression Molding Production

Understanding the temperature-dependent fatigue behavior is essential not only for material selection but also for designing advanced composite moulds and compression tooling. Mold temperature control, heating uniformity, and optimized venting must all be aligned with the specific thermal response of the material.

For example:

• Thermoset composites (e.g., SMC, BMC) require precise temperature control (135–160°C) to ensure full curing.
• Thermoplastic composites (e.g., LFT, CF-reinforced PP) need rapid heating & cooling cycles to maintain consistency.
• Carbon-fiber hybrid composites demand stable mold rigidity and low thermal distortion for aerospace-grade accuracy.

These factors directly influence mold lifespan, cycle time, and part repeatability—areas where MDC Mould has extensive industrial experience.

4. Research Funding and Industrial Context

This study is partially funded by the Italian Ministry of Enterprises and Made in Italy (MIMIT) under the project: “New Generation of Modular Intelligent Oleo-dynamic Pumps with Axial Flux Electric Motors.” The research aligns strongly with global industry trends in improving thermal stability and mechanical reliability of composite components used in motors, pumps, automotive assemblies, and energy systems.

Conclusion

The investigation into the temperature-dependent fatigue performance of thermoset and thermoplastic composites provides critical insights for high-precision composite manufacturing. As the automotive and energy industries transition toward lightweight structures, the demand for temperature-resistant, high-fatigue-strength materials will continue to rise.

With advanced technical capability in SMC molds, BMC molds, carbon fiber molds, thermoplastic composite molds, and large-format composite tooling, MDC Mould is positioned to support global customers developing next-generation high-performance composite parts.